Introduction
Epidemiology
- Incidence: 20.00 cases per 100,000 person-years
- Peak incidence: 60-70 years
- Sex ratio: 1:1
Condition | Relative incidence |
---|---|
Cellulitis | 75.00 |
Gout | 7.75 |
Bone metastases | 5.00 |
Osteomyelitis | 1 |
Avascular necrosis of the hip | 0.13 |
<1 | 1-5 | 6+ | 16+ | 30+ | 40+ | 50+ | 60+ | 70+ | 80+ |
Aetiology
- Haematogenous osteomyelitis is more likely when there is a remote source of infection, such as indwelling vascular catheters or intravenous drug use
- Nonhaematogenous osteomyelitis is associated with direct inoculation of the affected tissues via trauma or medical procedures
- Osteomyelitis is more likely if there is associated vascular insufficiency
Associated conditions
- Diabetes: poorly controlled diabetes with associated peripheral neuropathy and impairs blood supply can lead to the development of non-healing infected ulcers and secondary nonhaematogenous spread of the associated pathogens to bone
- Peripheral arterial disease can also cause osteomyelitis through a similar process to diabetes
- Sickle cell disease can cause infarction of the bone and bone marrow leading to secondary infection
Pathophysiology
- Damaged bone (be it traumatic or iatrogenic) is at risk of infection if exposed to a high enough concentrations of a pathogen.
- Staph aureus is the most common causative pathogen in osteomyelitis.
- Studies suggest it is able to adhere to multiple components within the bone matrix.
- It can survive within osteoblasts and seems to become more resistant to antibiotic treatment when it does so - potentially explaining why prolonged courses of antibiotics are needed to adequately treat it.
- In patients with sickle cell disease Salmonella is the most common cause
- Gram negative rods are identified in up to a third of cases
- Other causative pathogens may be seen in intravenous drug users or immunosuppressed patients
- Fungal osteomyelitis may be seen, again usually in patients with immunosuppression
There are two types of osteomyelitis as defined by their source: haematogenous and nonhaematogenous.
Haematogenous:
- More common of the two
- Describes osteomyelitis caused by seeding of microorganisms from another source
- More common in children and as a cause of vertebral osteomyelitis
- The presence of foreign bodies such as vascular catheters or orthopaedic hardware increases risk
- Intravenous drug users are particularly at risk
- May be caused as a sequelae of endocarditis
Nonhaematogenous:
- May be caused as a result of trauma/surgery or as a consequence of adjacent soft tissue infection
- Peripheral neuropathy (due to diabetes, for example) significantly increases risk
- The presence of vascular insufficiency can prevent wound healing, leading to persistent colonisation of associated pathogens
Clinical features
Acute osteomyelitis:
- Symptoms tend to develop gradually over a few days
- Pain is the most common symptom, along with warmth, erythema and swelling of the soft tissue surrounding the affected bone
- Osteomyelitis of the proximal joints such as the hips or vertebrae may present only with pain
- Systemic symptoms such as fever and malaise may be present
Chronic osteomyelitis:
- Tends to present only with local symptoms such as swelling, erythema and pain
- Systemic symptoms such as fever are often absent
- A draining sinus tract may be seen - this is pathognomonic of osteomyelitis
- Patients with diabetes or vascular insufficiency may develop osteomyelitis subsequent to foot ulcers without the classic symptoms described above
- May also present as non-healing fractures
- Diabetics with ulcers >2cm2 are very likely to have osteomyelitis, even if no bone is visible
- Some practitioners use a 'probe to bone test' when assessing diabetic foot ulcers - a sterile metal instrument is used to probe the ulcer, with the detection of a hard and gritty surface suggesting osteomyelitis. This may guide the need for further investigation such as imaging or biopsy.
%
Investigations
Blood tests:
- Non-specific inflammatory response may be seen in acute osteomyelitis with a raised white cell count and a C-reactive protein (CRP) or plasma viscosity (PV) rise
- White cell count will often be normal in chronic osteomyelitis
- Blood cultures are positive in about half of cases of acute osteomyelitis
X-Ray:
- May be normal for the first two weeks of infection
- Signs include soft tissue swelling, osteopaenia, bone destruction, periosteal reaction, endosteal scalloping and new bone apposition
- Cannot always distinguish between osteomyelitis and fracture or other processes such as Charcot arthropathy
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI):
- MRI is the imaging modality of choice in suspected osteomyelitis
- Imaging may be abnormal in the first few days of acute infection - initially with evidence of marrow oedema
- Able to identify soft tissue or joint complications
- Contrast does not improve diagnostic sensitivity but can improve imaging quality
Computed tomography (CT):
- Not as good as MRI but better than plain imaging alone where MRI is contraindicated (for example the patient has a pacemaker)
- Cannot detect marrow oedema so may be normal in early osteomyelitis
- Use of contrast improves ability to identify soft tissue abnormalities
Nuclear studies:
- Very sensitive at detecting inflammation
- May be used if CT and MRI are suboptimal (for example due to the presence of prosthetic material that degrades image quality)
- Multiple different modalities may be used
Ultrasound:
- Unable to visualise bone so of little use in the diagnosis of osteomyelitis
- May be used to identify surrounding soft tissue abnormalities such as abscesses or cellulitis
Histopathology:
- Bone biopsy can accurately identify osteomyelitis and its causative organism where imaging/blood analysis is inconclusive
- Not generally needed if there is convincing radiological evidence
- Biopsy sites can heal poorly if there is coexisting vascular insufficiency
Differential diagnosis
Soft tissue infection (e.g. cellulitis):
- Most common differential and may progress into osteomyelitis if untreated
- Difficult to differentiate clinically at initial presentation
- Osteomyelitis should be suspected if symptoms fail to respond to conventional short courses of antibiotics
- High risk patients such as diabetics or those with peripheral vascular disease should have a low threshold for imaging
Charcot arthropathy:
- Acute Charot arthropathy may present with similar symptoms to osteomyelitis
- Often co-exists with skin ulcers than can lead to chronic osteomyelitis
- May be differentiated on MRI
- Bone biopsy may be needed if there is diagnostic uncertainty
Gout:
- Much more common than osteomyelitis but with a faster onset
- More likely in a patient without any risk factors for osteomyelitis
- Will generally have no systemic symptoms
Fracture:
- May be difficult to distinguish on initial imaging
- Fractures that fail to heal should raise suspicion for osteomyelitis
- Bone biopsy may be needed to confirm a diagnosis
Avascular necrosis (AVN):
- Symptoms are similar but AVN will usually have a clear trigger such as radiation exposure or a history of bisphosphonate use, otherwise AVN is very unlikely
- May co-exist with osteomyelitis in osteonecrosis of the jaw
Management
Antibiotic therapy:
- Antibiotic therapy should be guided by local microbiology advice
- The BNF recommends flucloxacillin (clindamycin if penicillin allergic), with consideration of the addition of fusidic acid or rifampicin for the first two weeks
- If meticillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is suspected, vancomycin or teicoplanin is recommended
- If the affected bone is completely removed a short duration of antibiotics may be sufficient
- Otherwise at least 6 weeks of treatment, usually parental via PICC is needed
Surgery:
- For adequate treatment of osteomyelitis any infected necrotic bone must be removed
- Patients with necrotising soft tissue infection or secondary systemic infection from osteomyelitis may need urgent surgical debridement
- A soft tissue envelope must be left over the site of infection to allow healing
- If there is involvement of orthopaedic hardware specialist opinion must be sought as removal may be needed
Prognosis
- Success rates for treatment are reported from 60-90%
- Co-existent vascular insufficiency or diabetes will adversely affect treatment outcomes